Flaws of Capitalism:

Capitalism maximizes profit for a few while cannibalizing on health, environment etc. it will maximize 'the economy' but in numbers only. (But remember you can't eat money, it's just a number!) But in the health sector capitalism actually leads to... MORE ILLNESS! (There’s no profit in everyone being healthy)

- Capitalism creates a Plutonomy: Wealthy with power and poor who are powerless.
Everyone wants to be rich, but unfortunately it seems a minority of people is greedy, ruthless and smart enough to use the hope the majority (who don't posses said qualities) has to deceive the majority into handing over their labour, rights and assets. 

Result: The majority will: 
-take out loans thinking it makes them wealthier,
-participate in pyramid schemes like the stock market or Amway,
-give up their rights to protest, rights to privacy
-pay taxes which end up supporting the wealthy, and only suppress and keep 
-accept drugs and vaccinations which actually have side effects=create more sickness

Health industry, cancer and a profit based pharmaceutical industry:
In one sector especially the Capitalist system is absolutely and most stunningly flawed:
The Pharmaceutical and health industry: it's rather simple really: more sick people means more profit.
There just IS no money (in the capitalist system) in creating a cheap but complete cure for any illness!
The money is in temporary suppressing of symptoms, remedies, who you need keeping the rest of your life, otherwise the illness returns.
An Example:
China for example has found a dirt cheap, side-effect free, quick and permanent cure for malaria. It’s called Artemisinin and it’s made of a weed (wormwood) that's grows anywhere. As a result China has no malaria problem. But pharmaceutical forces are pushing to prohibit the sale of the drug saying 'it's the only cure for malaria we have left’ where resistance of parasites did not develop yet. And so no-one should use this product. Despite the fact that the drug has been used for thousands of years! Resistance of the parasites has never occurred because it's a biologically recognized substance: The halftime of Artemisinin is 30 mins! Our body filters most of it out of the bloodstream within an hour! That is the reason why it is safe: but money has even bought laboratories to prove that resistance is already starting to occur (only in laboratory controlled research paid by the anti-Artemisinin industry!). Chloroquine, Lariam stay in the bloodstream for weeks. And as a result parasites have gained resistance to the drugs mostly within 5 years! While: I repeat: Artemisinin has been in use for decades if not centuries.
The real reason for the fight:
Artemisinin is not patentable... (As it's a plant compound) and thus not profitable, but moreover a threat to all the already patentable, ineffective (personal experience! got malaria anyway despite taking lariam!) dangerous (many side-effects) and 10x expensive drugs 'available' on the market. As a customer you'd like all alternatives available. But more often then not the cheap and effective alternative is not available. It’s simply not profitable to the already profiting industry for a cheap and safe alternative to be available!

More side effects means more future customers and profit, it is inevitable that drugs with side effects are chosen over drugs with no side effects, because more illness created more profit. A cheap cure is patented? The pharmaceutical company will buy it up to prevent anyone from making it as it would threaten the other solution: a medicine that only suppresses the symptoms. When you stop taking it, the symptoms recur. (As opposed to a cure: something you take once, and once and for all you are cured!)

The cancer industry:

Sadly... the cancer research started as research how to CAUSE Cancer (not: prevent cancer!) and the first human guinea pigs were Jews from concentration camps. It was the Germans who started cancer research. Cancer is a great profitable disease: the causes are obscure and many; and it's very easy to sell products that have such low cancer inducing properties that no-one can prove you caused it. (Example: aspartame=light products)
Chemotherapies profit the pharmaceutical industry a whopping 100.00 USD per patient per year of treatment! 

Know that presently 40% of all Americans get cancer! despite all the billions of taxpayers' money into 'cancer research'. Remember: it was the cigarette industry who was smart enough to pre-emptively fund the cancer research institutes. Cancer 'research' is totally controlled financially by those profiting from present-day expensive treatments to cancer!  And thus it will never come up with a cheaper alternative, or produce a solution which will result in less or no people getting cancer. 

Note that cures are still no more effective then 40 years ago –despite all the funds the industry received- and cures still cost a fortune, but hey! They will save your life! temporarily, as most chemotherapies are in fact carcinogens! (Same with radiotherapy). On the other hand promising therapies often with less side-effects and better cure rates which are not patentable or discovered by private research are fought to the teeth. Often whole laboratories get confiscated and people put in jail when they discovered anything promising to be a rival to this 250 (!) billion (!) dollar industry. 
Cancer industry totals 250 billion USD per year! This profit driven incentive has led that many products that cause cancer are not abolished, but -instead- promoted. 
Think of Mercury in vaccines, NutraSweet/aspartame in food, Fluoride in drinking water.
Aspartame was in fact so much Carcinogenic that the scientists at the FDA refused to approve it for 3 decades! Finally the financial gains won: director of the FDA single-handedly approved the product, and consequently got awarded a CEO payment at NutraSweet after departure from the FDA. Meanwhile completely harmless tealeaves that can be used as alternatives to low calorie sweeteners are not allowed to be sold as sweeteners by the very same FDA.

And so it seems that the leaders of this industry are introducing and promoting carcinogens in a variety of products in deep secret. Whether or not there is conscious intent or negligence is not known. But it remains probable and logical that an industry profiting so greatly from cancer is intent to fight any cures which would be competitive, effective and affordable.
We all know it’s a proven fact that when pharmaceutical companies discover that one of their profitable drugs cause mayor side-effects in almost all cases this information is suppressed and the sales are continued.

What to do? I don't know. But at least it pays to go out there and research the truth.

Socializing Healthcare a solution?

So Obama must be right in socializing Healthcare!? Well if you think about it: having insurances for all citizens only guarantees that the hospitals and thus pharmaceuticals will receive their money! When a poor person will get cancer, the industry will still receive it’s hundreds of thousands of dollars profit!
Who will bear the cost: you take an educated guess: ‘We the people’! 

What has to be changed is the structure of the FDA. Applying for any drug now costs about 250million dollars, even when the product is plant based and harmless. The fee is more like a minimum bribe the FDA requires to approve your product! FDA is owned by the industry, the ones that should run the FDA and healthcare research are the insurance companies, as they will benefit from lower costs!